- Home
- Practice areas
- Complex Litigation
- Litigation Strategy
Litigation strategy in Brazil from the very first filing
In a high-value case, every procedural step opens or closes a door. Companies that choose their route too late find that the other side has already chosen it for them.
Litigation strategy is the plan that defines, before the first filing, which theory to argue, what evidence to build, which urgent measures to seek and how to preserve access to Brazil's higher courts. Engage a lawyer when the case involves significant value, operational risk or parallel disputes over the same facts, ideally before filing suit or after service of process.
A litigation strategy in Brazil turns the dispute into a plan instead of a string of reactions. It sets the main and alternative legal theories, the evidence that must exist, the right moment to seek urgent relief and what must be on the record for a possible appeal to the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) or the Federal Supreme Court (STF).
This matters because the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure (CPC, Law 13,105/2015, the statute that governs civil lawsuits) penalizes improvisation. Deadlines run in business days (art. 219), the general deadline to appeal is 15 days (art. 1,003, § 5) and an argument not raised at the proper time may be precluded, that is, barred for good. An omission at trial level can block a debate before a higher court years later.
We treat each case as a project with a business goal. Before drafting, we ask what the company needs to protect: cash, a contract, reputation or market position. From there, every filing serves the plan, not the other way around.
When to call a lawyer
Served in a high-value lawsuit
The deadline to answer is already running. The defense filed within it sets the limits of the debate and of the evidence for the entire case.
More than one front over the same facts
A lawsuit, an administrative proceeding and an arbitration on the same relationship require consistent arguments. A contradiction on one front becomes evidence on another.
Risk of immediate impact on operations
An opposing request for urgent relief, an online freeze of bank accounts or the suspension of a contract calls for a fast, planned response, not a merely reactive one.
Ongoing case with no clear direction
Filings that only answer the last move, expert evidence not yet considered and no scenario analysis signal that the case needs a strategic review.
What happens when you put it off
- Preclusion: an argument or piece of evidence not submitted at the proper procedural stage may no longer be admitted.
- Missed deadlines: with 15 business days for most appeals, an adverse decision becomes final if no one reacts in time.
- Asset freezes: without a prepared response to urgent motions, bank accounts and assets are exposed to seizure before the merits are discussed.
- Adverse precedent: a poorly presented argument can produce a ruling that the other party and other litigants will use against the company.
How we work
Case diagnosis
Review of documents, contracts and procedural history to map facts, risks, running deadlines and the client's business objective.
Theory and evidence design
Definition of the main theory and alternatives, with the evidence supporting each. When useful, we consider early production of evidence (art. 381 CPC) and procedural agreements between the parties (art. 190 CPC).
Urgency plan
Advance preparation of requests for provisional relief, which require likelihood of the right and risk of harm (art. 300 CPC), and of defenses against seizures.
Coordinated execution
Filings, hearings and expert examinations handled according to the plan, with federal and constitutional issues placed on the record from the early stages.
Periodic review
Reassessment of the strategy after each relevant decision, with updated scenarios and a recommendation on settlement, appeal or continuation.
What you receive
- Strategy memorandum with main theory, alternative theories and required evidence
- Procedural calendar with deadlines counted in business days
- Scenario matrix with risks and settlement decision points
- Draft urgent relief motions ready for when the facts require them
- Periodic reports in business language for management and auditors
Why the firm
Plan before paper
No relevant filing goes out without being tied to a goal defined in the case plan.
A view all the way to the higher courts
We consider the admissibility of special and extraordinary appeals from the complaint or the answer onward.
Multidisciplinary reading
Civil, corporate, administrative and regulatory law assessed together, because disputes rarely respect the boundaries between fields.
Illustrative scenario
Hypothetical scenario, for illustration only. A manufacturer is served with a damages lawsuit filed by a distributor, who also asks for a freeze of funds. At the same time, the distributor takes the same facts to a competition authority. In this scenario, the litigation strategy would start by aligning the narrative on both fronts, preparing a planned response to the urgent request and choosing the expert evidence to support the defense. The answer would already record the federal law issues that could reach the STJ. The outcome would depend on the evidence and on the judges. The plan would ensure that no door closes for lack of preparation.
A hypothetical scenario, shown only to illustrate our method. Every case depends on its own facts.Frequently asked questions
What is litigation strategy in Brazil?
It is the plan that guides the entire dispute, from the first filing to the last appeal. It defines the theory, the evidence, the timing of urgent measures and the settlement decision points. Without it, each procedural step only responds to the previous one.
When should a company hire a lawyer to build its litigation strategy?
Ideally before filing suit or right after being served. At that stage it is still possible to choose the theory, organize the evidence and avoid preclusion. Ongoing cases can also be reviewed, but some choices may already have been made.
What is the deadline to appeal a decision in Brazilian civil proceedings?
As a rule, 15 business days, under art. 1,003, § 5, combined with art. 219 of the CPC. The exception is the motion for clarification (embargos de declaração), with a 5-day deadline (art. 1,023). Public entities get double time (art. 183).
Can we obtain a fast ruling before the case ends?
Yes, through urgent relief under art. 300 of the CPC. The party must show the likelihood of the right and a risk of harm or of rendering the lawsuit useless. The request can be filed before the main action or during it.
Can the parties agree on procedural rules for their own case?
Yes, within limits. Art. 190 of the CPC allows procedural agreements when the right in dispute can be settled: the parties may adjust the procedure and agree on burdens, powers and duties. The judge reviews the validity of the agreement.
Does a good litigation strategy guarantee a win?
No. No lawyer can promise the outcome of a lawsuit. What strategy offers is fewer avoidable risks, informed decisions and efficient use of the evidence and deadlines available.
Related matters
Other matters in this area
Does your case have a written plan?
Send us the summons or the latest decision. Our team will review the running deadlines and indicate the next step of the strategy.